Saturday, June 22, 2013
Rethinking the Cost of Time
Building design and construction have been governed in modern history by
our perception of time as a cost-based commodity. Both design
and construction are assumed to have greater competitive value if
production time is minimized. The first cost is generally lower if it
takes less time to design and build a project. We can
recognize an inverse relationship between first cost and long term cost when we
consider building products (e.g., cheap windows vs. expensive windows),
where lowest first cost may lead to higher long term costs in energy
usage, maintenance, and replacement. Yet, as a profession and an
industry, we have not been able or willing to recognize the long term value
of time invested in design and construction, such that more available
time (if well managed) results in more integrated attention to systems
and details that enhance long term building performance and optimize
long term operating costs. This issue is most notable in our continuing
willingness to commit to abbreviated time periods for design and
construction. We talk about the value of high performance buildings in
terms of energy efficiency and healthful environments, yet the market
continues to demand speed over performance due largely to the long
established premise that "time is money" - a premise that is reinforced
by the owner who wants the building quicker and by the designer and
contractor who must bid low to get the job and then minimize time in
order to avoid loss. When minimizing time is the highest priority, long
term performance may suffer. Owners, designers,
and contractors need to rethink the cost (and focus) of design and
construction time as they relate to long term building performance. We
have come to recognize long term risks associated with fast food; fast
design and construction deserve similar consideration.
No comments:
Post a Comment